Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MATTEO BR

IMO: 9556844
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 16,142 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.65 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Blu Marine Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,142 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

73.2

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+108%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

13.3

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−48%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,336 t

CO₂ emitted

7,388 t

7,503 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,917 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,176 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+108%)

17.4Ranks 2,336 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.3 (+9%)

6.9Faster than 65% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 13.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−48%)

10.2Ranks 400 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU30%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,726 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

332 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+115 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MATTEO BR
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MATTEO BR
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MATTEO BR
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−6%	−11%	+21%	−13%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+10%	+9%	−13%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	+18%	−91%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+12%	+7%	−18%	+939%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	+1%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+6.2 kn	−18%	+83%	+29%	−16%	6.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.9 kn	+16%	−47%	−44%	+19%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Blu Marine Srl	2,336	7,388	31,917	3,176	10.1	73.2	14.3	–
2024	Blu Marine Srl	2,043	6,419	26,325	2,468	10.7	77.6	16.7	–
2023	not published	2,142	6,781	30,227	2,825	10.7	70.8	15.4	–
2022	not published	1,988	6,297	25,533	2,372	10.8	77.8	21.2	–
2021	not published	2,158	6,835	31,207	2,769	11.3	69.2	14.6	–
2020	not published	2,111	6,621	30,836	2,762	11.2	68.5	13.5	38%
2019	not published	1,996	6,262	23,817	4,802	5.0	83.8	16.1	93%
2018	not published	3,053	9,577	42,410	3,898	10.9	72.0	13.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Blu Marine Srl	13.3	25.5	−48%	400 of 2,723	RINA	A+B
2024	Blu Marine Srl	15.3	19.3	−20%	416 of 1,111	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	13.6	20.7	−34%	282 of 1,045	RINA	A+B
2022	not published	151	21.6	+602%	1,017 of 1,034	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	14.6	8.57	+70%	3,057 of 3,466	RINA	A+B
2020	not published	13.5	8.24	+64%	2,750 of 3,150	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	16.1	8.38	+92%	3,071 of 3,360	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	13.5	8.50	+59%	2,870 of 3,384	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.