Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

GARIP BABA

IMO
9564970
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Turkiye
Port of registry
Istanbul
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
32.5
General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (−8%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
18.6
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−27%)
Average speed
9.6 kn
General cargo median 9.3 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
7.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
762 t
CO₂ emitted
2,440 t
2,478 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
23,451 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,431 h
101 days, 28% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 32.5 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−8%)
17.4Ranks 1,272 of 2,723, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 9.3 (+3%)
6.9Faster than 57% of general cargo ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−27%)
10.2Ranks 686 of 2,723, lowest first52.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports21%
  • From the EU42%
  • Into the EU33%
  • At berth in the EU4%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,506 t).

Fuel burned laden
11 t
1% of all fuel; 99% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
94 t
3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+38 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GARIP BABA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • GARIP BABA
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • GARIP BABA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.9 kn−11%−1%+88%+1%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.1 kn+17%+4%−12%−21%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.0 kn−7%+3%−24%+45%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.0 kn+6%−5%−46%+6%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.2 kn−7%−5%+189%−10%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.3 kn−11%−8%−43%+3%Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.4 kn−2%−5%−2%−1%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S7622,44023,4512,4319.632.5–1%
2024YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S4541,45612,4801,4408.736.4––
2023not published4411,41414,1191,4429.831.223.4–
2022not published6252,00318,5272,1018.833.720.6–
2021not published1,0943,50734,4573,5069.831.716.8–
2020not published4091,31111,9431,2389.634.218.88%
2019not published8022,51120,8212,2489.338.518.315%
2018not published8322,60621,1662,1909.739.317.814%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S18.625.5−27%686 of 2,723Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2024YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S18.419.3−4%516 of 1,111Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2023not published23.420.7+13%634 of 1,045Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2022not published16.121.6−25%296 of 1,034Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2021not published15.322.7−33%232 of 1,142Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2020not published16.924.5−31%236 of 1,167Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2019not published16.325.0−35%217 of 1,154Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2018not published16.424.9−34%221 of 1,044Lloyd's RegisterA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.