Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MINERVAGRACHT

IMO: 9571521
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.33 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

59.4 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+68%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

41.59

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+63%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+33%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,011 t

CO₂ emitted

3,155 t

3,204 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,022 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,378 h

57 days, 16% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 59.4 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+68%)

17.4Ranks 2,027 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 9.3 (+33%)

7.0Faster than 92% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 41.59 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+63%)

10.14Ranks 2,257 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU78%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,595 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MINERVAGRACHT
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MINERVAGRACHT
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MINERVAGRACHT
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	+9%	+21%	−58%	+64%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−15%	−14%	−19%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+10%	−1%	+12%	+11%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	−8%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−6%	−2%	+90%	−14%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+18%	+21%	+133%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−15%	−22%	−69%	−24%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	1,011	3,155	17,022	1,378	12.4	59.4	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	2,215	6,916	40,676	3,643	11.2	54.5	–	–
2023	not published	3,221	10,055	50,252	4,583	11.0	64.1	–	–
2022	not published	2,604	8,122	44,760	3,654	12.3	58.2	–	–
2021	not published	2,907	9,083	48,684	3,950	12.3	59.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,631	5,127	25,600	2,172	11.8	63.7	–	–
2019	not published	591	1,845	10,986	950	11.6	53.8	–	–
2018	not published	2,259	7,066	35,717	2,848	12.5	63.2	34.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	41.59	25.45	+63%	2,257 of 2,706	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	25.43	19.25	+32%	795 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	27.88	20.67	+35%	779 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	25.13	21.57	+17%	641 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	25.23	22.70	+11%	698 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	29.33	24.50	+20%	778 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	17.92	24.96	−28%	262 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	23.51	24.89	−6%	473 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.