Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

AMISOS

IMO
9584994
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEXI 12.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
38.3
General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+9%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
21.7
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−15%)
Average speed
9.5 kn
General cargo median 9.3 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
8.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,385 t
CO₂ emitted
4,440 t
4,508 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
36,116 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,803 h
158 days, 43% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 38.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+9%)
17.4Ranks 1,487 of 2,723, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 9.3 (+2%)
6.9Faster than 54% of general cargo ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 21.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−15%)
10.2Ranks 983 of 2,723, lowest first52.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports26%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU29%
  • At berth in the EU5%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,897 t).

Fuel burned laden
115 t
8% of all fuel; 92% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
214 t
4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+68 t
+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AMISOS
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • AMISOS
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • AMISOS
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.3 kn−0%−3%−11%+85%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.2 kn+4%+1%+11%−48%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.0 kn+2%+3%−15%+27%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+0.3 kn−4%−2%+6%−2%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.0 kn−1%−1%+29%+7%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020+2.7 kn−2%+35%+32%+5%2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.7 kn+1%−7%−42%−3%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S1,3854,44036,1163,8039.538.3–8%
2024YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S1,5544,98240,4614,1339.838.4––
2023not published1,3374,28736,3063,61510.036.822.5–
2022not published1,5414,93942,5514,27610.036.216.2–
2021not published1,5164,86140,0544,1229.737.919.9–
2020not published1,1823,79030,9913,1899.738.119.1–
2019not published9142,86623,5203,3417.038.917.6–
2018not published1,5474,84640,3205,2277.738.418.3–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S21.725.5−15%983 of 2,723Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2024YILMAR LOJISTIK GEMI ACENT. DEN. VE TIC. A.S11.819.3−39%310 of 1,111Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2023not published22.520.7+9%606 of 1,045Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2022not published17.821.6−18%347 of 1,034Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2021not published18.222.7−20%356 of 1,142Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2020not published17.124.5−30%243 of 1,167Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2019not published16.225.0−35%213 of 1,154Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2018not published16.724.9−33%233 of 1,044Lloyd's Register–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.