Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

IPPOKRATIS

IMO: 9585663
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 19,075 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CIELO DI SAN FRANCISCO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVINA MARITIME S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,075 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.7

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+102%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

867 t

CO₂ emitted

2,753 t

2,795 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,059 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

942 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+16%)

61.0Ranks 2,712 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.7 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 19% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+102%)

4.80Ranks 3,250 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU33%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU9%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,582 t).

Fuel burned laden

499 t

58% of all fuel; 42% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

260 t

9.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+42 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

IPPOKRATIS
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

IPPOKRATIS
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

IPPOKRATIS
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+17%	+1%	−66%	+31%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−12%	−15%	+75%	+7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+9%	+2%	+17%	+18%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+17%	+9%	−28%	+10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−19%	−11%	−26%	−42%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+12%	+8%	+135%	+21%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+3%	+13%	−54%	+24%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NAVINA MARITIME S.A.	867	2,753	9,059	942	9.6	95.7	15.9	58%
2024	NAVINA MARITIME S.A.	2,195	6,913	26,814	2,414	11.1	81.9	12.2	87%
2023	not published	1,436	4,521	15,363	1,343	11.4	93.5	11.3	74%
2022	not published	1,131	3,572	13,180	1,072	12.3	85.8	9.55	81%
2021	not published	1,344	4,256	18,339	1,382	13.3	73.3	8.68	79%
2020	not published	2,232	7,001	24,692	2,040	12.1	90.4	15.1	–
2019	not published	847	2,658	10,518	836	12.6	80.5	12.5	–
2018	not published	1,794	5,637	22,920	2,001	11.5	78.2	10.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NAVINA MARITIME S.A.	15.9	7.90	+102%	3,250 of 3,611	ABS	A
2024	NAVINA MARITIME S.A.	12.2	8.09	+50%	2,524 of 3,089	ABS	A
2023	not published	11.3	8.27	+37%	2,640 of 3,548	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	9.55	8.71	+10%	2,333 of 3,968	ABS	A+B
2021	not published	8.68	8.57	+1%	1,775 of 3,466	ABS	A
2020	not published	15.1	8.24	+83%	2,860 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	12.5	8.38	+49%	2,738 of 3,360	RINA	B
2018	not published	10.1	8.50	+19%	2,257 of 3,384	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.