Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BERGENSFJORD

IMO: 9586617
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Hirtshals
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fjord Line Danmark A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

108

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

521

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

71.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−72%)

Average speed

17.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,382 t

CO₂ emitted

36,428 t

47,219 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

124,066 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,973 h

291 days, 80% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 108 kg/nm · median 150 (−28%)

69.3Ranks 103 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 17.8 kn · median 15.8 (+13%)

12.0Faster than 68% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 521 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−8%)

66.8Ranks 191 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 71.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−72%)

48.6Ranks 61 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (36,428 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,603 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

370.9 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+10,791 t

+29.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BERGENSFJORD
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BERGENSFJORD
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BERGENSFJORD
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BERGENSFJORD
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	−5%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2024	+0.2 kn	+1%	+2%	+46%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	−1%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+8%	+6%	−29%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−5%	−9%	+8%	−4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	13,382	36,428	124,066	6,973	17.8	108	–	–
2024LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	14,854	40,464	130,031	7,271	17.9	114	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10,018	28,043	88,866	5,013	17.7	113	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,826	30,227	89,370	5,081	17.6	121	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14,250	39,586	126,685	7,108	17.8	113	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	13,855	38,495	116,989	6,299	18.6	118	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	521	567	−8%	191 of 408	71.8	253	−72%	DNV	A+B+C
2024LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	397	547	−27%	167 of 404	227	233	−3%	DNV	A+B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	242	815	−70%	106 of 377	339	226	+50%	Verifavia	A
2020LNG / alt.	not published	220	751	−71%	102 of 387	335	217	+54%	Verifavia	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	222	569	−61%	114 of 394	381	223	+71%	Verifavia	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	231	729	−68%	104 of 361	392	184	+113%	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.