Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

JAG PRACHI

IMO: 9590723
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 33,448 t
Port of registry: Mumbai
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.86 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LADY MALOU

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,448 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

89.5

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+6%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,286 t

CO₂ emitted

4,034 t

4,097 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,373 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,327 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.5 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−30%)

76.1Ranks 310 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.0Faster than 53% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+6%)

4.51Ranks 904 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU51%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU6%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,208 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

236 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+63 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JAG PRACHI
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JAG PRACHI
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JAG PRACHI
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	+7%	−1%	−58%	−22%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	+39%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+24%	+19%	+139%	+63%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−35%	−35%	−16%	−52%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+11%	+13%	+265%	+75%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−4%	+1%	−82%	−42%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	−20%	+28%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	1,286	4,034	14,373	1,327	10.8	89.5	8.39	–
2024part-year	Latsco Marine Management Inc.	700	2,222	7,087	636	11.1	98.8	13.47	–
2024	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	2,837	8,930	33,948	2,893	11.7	83.6	10.81	–
2023	not published	1,999	6,277	24,393	2,047	11.9	82.0	10.67	61%
2022	not published	677	2,135	10,213	824	12.4	66.3	6.55	100%
2021	not published	1,239	3,936	12,204	975	12.5	101.5	13.53	66%
2020	not published	307	973	3,345	272	12.3	91.8	7.75	–
2019	not published	1,807	5,660	18,845	1,623	11.6	95.9	13.40	–
2018	not published	2,141	6,677	23,416	1,973	11.9	91.4	10.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	8.39	7.95	+6%	904 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	Latsco Marine Management Inc.	–	–	–	–	ABS	A+B+C
2024	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	10.81	8.06	+34%	1,238 of 1,787	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	10.67	8.44	+26%	1,186 of 1,797	ABS	A+B+C
2022	not published	6.55	8.51	−23%	586 of 1,961	ABS	A+C
2021	not published	13.53	8.86	+53%	1,313 of 1,789	ABS	A+B+C
2020	not published	7.75	9.03	−14%	727 of 1,870	ABS	A+B+C
2019	not published	13.40	8.83	+52%	1,426 of 1,919	ABS	A+B+C
2018	not published	10.46	8.86	+18%	1,087 of 1,779	ABS	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.