Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ALEXANDRIA

IMO: 9592616
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 29,701 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Z & G HALCOUSSIS CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,701 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

110

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+48%)

Average speed

8.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,930 t

CO₂ emitted

9,208 t

9,352 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,590 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,250 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+33%)

61.0Ranks 3,192 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 8.2 kn · median 10.7 (−23%)

8.8Faster than 6% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+48%)

4.80Ranks 2,896 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,896 t).

Fuel burned laden

1,606 t

55% of all fuel; 45% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

584 t

6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+144 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALEXANDRIA
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALEXANDRIA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALEXANDRIA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	−3%	−34%	+233%	–	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	+319%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−6%	+1%	−94%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−15%	−14%	+89%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	+11%	+1%	−33%	+3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.8 kn	−6%	+56%	+657%	−34%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Z & G HALCOUSSIS CO., LTD.	2,930	9,208	26,590	3,250	8.2	110	11.7	55%
2024	Z & G HALCOUSSIS CO., LTD.	904	2,825	7,976	662	12.0	113	–	–
2022	not published	208	650	1,902	157	12.1	109	–	–
2021	not published	3,459	10,835	29,768	2,645	11.3	116	9.48	–
2020	not published	2,161	6,861	15,712	1,416	11.1	138	9.85	–
2019	not published	2,905	9,108	23,528	1,934	12.2	124	9.57	–
2018	not published	408	1,276	3,110	423	7.4	131	14.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Z & G HALCOUSSIS CO., LTD.	11.7	7.90	+48%	2,896 of 3,611	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	Z & G HALCOUSSIS CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	9.48	8.57	+11%	2,093 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	9.85	8.24	+20%	2,126 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	9.57	8.38	+14%	2,124 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	14.4	8.50	+70%	2,951 of 3,384	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.