Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

HISTRIA AMBRA

IMO
9607631
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
19,753 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.31 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Histria Shipmanagement Srl

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,753 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
101
Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−22%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
16.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+103%)
Average speed
9.6 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−10%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,020 t
CO₂ emitted
9,570 t
9,718 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
30,018 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,142 h
131 days, 36% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 101 kg/nm · median 129 (−22%)
76.1Ranks 421 of 1,665, lowest first191
Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.7 (−10%)
8.0Faster than 24% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+103%)
4.51Ranks 1,322 of 1,665, lowest first27.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports35%
  • From the EU24%
  • Into the EU27%
  • At berth in the EU14%

75% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,139 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,305 t
13.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+148 t
+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • HISTRIA AMBRA
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • HISTRIA AMBRA
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • HISTRIA AMBRA
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.2 kn+12%+9%−6%+30%Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.0 kn−7%−7%+15%−15%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.2 kn+5%+3%−1%+12%Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.2 kn+6%+3%−14%−10%Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.9 kn−10%−1%−12%+3%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+2.9 kn−4%+39%+26%−18%2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.5 kn−1%−20%+29%+13%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Histria Shipmanagement Srl3,0209,57030,0183,1429.610116.1–
2024Histria Shipmanagement Srl2,8809,03632,0353,2799.889.912.5–
2023not published2,6828,48227,7802,8379.896.514.6–
2022not published2,5698,08628,0312,80710.091.713.0–
2021not published2,8168,81732,4123,18010.286.914.4–
2020not published3,55111,13236,7693,9429.396.613.9–
2019not published2,9479,22729,1864,5736.410117.0–
2018not published2,2967,20022,5632,8607.910215.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Histria Shipmanagement Srl16.17.95+103%1,322 of 1,665DNVA
2024Histria Shipmanagement Srl12.58.06+55%1,340 of 1,787DNVA
2023not published14.68.44+73%1,411 of 1,797DNVA
2022not published13.08.51+53%1,447 of 1,961DNVA
2021not published14.48.86+62%1,344 of 1,789DNVA
2020not published13.99.03+54%1,359 of 1,870DNVA
2019not published17.08.83+93%1,566 of 1,919DNVA
2018not published15.18.86+71%1,397 of 1,779DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.