Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TIGER SOUTH

IMO: 9619854
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 30,215 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,215 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.2

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+29%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,454 t

CO₂ emitted

4,553 t

4,624 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,802 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,193 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+19%)

61.0Ranks 2,845 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 10.7 (+16%)

8.8Faster than 97% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+29%)

4.80Ranks 2,607 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU42%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,328 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

51 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+71 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIGER SOUTH
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

TIGER SOUTH
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TIGER SOUTH
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+0.8 kn	+1%	+9%	−27%	+12%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−11%	−7%	−2%	+4%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−18%	−13%	+369%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	+25%	+9%	−89%	–	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+18%	+22%	+931%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd	1,454	4,553	14,802	1,193	12.4	98.2	10.2	–
2022	not published	1,971	6,168	20,330	1,757	11.6	96.9	9.06	–
2021	not published	2,257	7,081	20,756	1,884	11.0	109	8.69	–
2020	not published	586	1,838	4,421	426	10.4	133	246	–
2019	not published	4,231	13,233	39,991	3,337	12.0	106	9.61	–
2018	not published	347	1,083	3,878	335	11.6	89.6	9.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd	10.2	7.90	+29%	2,607 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	9.06	8.71	+4%	2,135 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	8.69	8.57	+1%	1,782 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.61	8.38	+15%	2,140 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.77	8.50	+15%	2,139 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.