Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

WILFORCE

IMO
9627954
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Awilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
225
LNG carrier median 190 kg/nm (+18%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
11.3
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+59%)
Average speed
8.0 kn
LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−44%)
Fuel per day at sea
43.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,667 t
CO₂ emitted
10,177 t
12,682 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
16,283 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,045 h
85 days, 23% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 225 kg/nm · median 190 (+18%)
152Ranks 270 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 14.4 (−44%)
11.2Faster than 3% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+59%)
5.06Ranks 321 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU56%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,136 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
95 t
0.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
85.2 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq uplift
+2,505 t
+24.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • WILFORCE
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • WILFORCE
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • WILFORCE
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−5.1 kn+0%−39%−66%+5%5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024−1.6 kn−7%−17%+193%−69%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2022+0.4 kn−15%−12%−14%–0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGAwilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS3,66710,17716,2832,0458.0225––
2024LNGAwilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS10,63128,72347,4423,62013.1224––
2022not published3,88811,59116,2051,10214.7240––
2018LNG / alt.not published5,30814,73018,8731,32214.3281––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGAwilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS11.37.12+59%321 of 386DNVB+C
2024LNGAwilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS10.87.39+46%239 of 312DNVB+C
2022not published34.810.4+235%353 of 379DNVB+C
2018LNG / alt.not published––––DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.