Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GREAT MIND

IMO: 9629627
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 28,801 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,801 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.4

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+28%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

965 t

CO₂ emitted

3,012 t

3,060 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,125 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

928 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.4 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+13%)

61.8Ranks 2,172 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.6 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 61% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+28%)

4.85Ranks 2,215 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU43%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU5%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,798 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

139 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+48 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GREAT MIND
Bulk carrier median

80.085.090.095.0100.0105.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

GREAT MIND
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GREAT MIND
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2024	−0.8 kn	+8%	+1%	−25%	+57%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−14%	−12%	+44%	−39%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+0%	−4%	−17%	−21%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	+6%	+26%	−46%	+89%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	−5%	+18%	+40%	−4%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited	965	3,012	10,125	928	10.9	95.4	10.3	–
2022	not published	1,198	3,740	13,548	1,160	11.7	88.4	6.58	–
2021	not published	967	3,026	9,427	824	11.4	103	10.9	–
2020	not published	1,159	3,620	11,355	944	12.0	102	13.7	–
2019	not published	2,043	6,369	21,185	2,093	10.1	96.5	7.24	–
2018	not published	1,541	4,812	15,121	1,868	8.1	102	7.54	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited	10.3	8.09	+28%	2,215 of 3,089	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.58	8.71	−24%	972 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	10.9	8.57	+27%	2,509 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.7	8.24	+66%	2,763 of 3,150	DNV	C
2019	not published	7.24	8.38	−14%	1,203 of 3,360	DNV	C
2018	not published	7.54	8.50	−11%	1,289 of 3,384	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.