Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

SAMSKIP KVITBJØRN

IMO: 9642564
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,028 t
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nav-Tech BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,028 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

42.0

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

55.87

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−41%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,558 t

CO₂ emitted

6,898 t

8,769 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

60,880 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,955 h

206 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 42.0 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−60%)

56.6Ranks 9 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 14.4 (−15%)

10.9Faster than 21% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.87 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−41%)

47.35Ranks 40 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU15%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,898 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

14.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

64.2 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.271

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAMSKIP KVITBJØRN
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAMSKIP KVITBJØRN
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SAMSKIP KVITBJØRN
Ro-ro median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’192019’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	−11%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+2%	+5%	+0%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	+5%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.8 kn	+4%	+23%	−10%	–	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	−2%	−21%	+19%	–	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	−7%	+10%	+4%	–	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Nav-Tech BV	2,558	6,898	60,880	4,955	12.3	42.0	55.87	–
2024LNG	Nav-Tech BV	3,020	8,125	68,714	5,659	12.1	43.9	63.93	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,942	8,172	68,388	5,775	11.8	43.0	66.33	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,884	8,212	65,062	5,460	11.9	44.3	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,065	8,502	72,120	7,116	10.1	42.5	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,630	7,297	60,602	4,801	12.6	43.4	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,701	7,517	58,068	5,465	10.6	46.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Nav-Tech BV	55.87	95.19	−41%	40 of 235	DNV	B
2024LNG	Nav-Tech BV	63.93	97.53	−34%	45 of 220	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	66.33	108.62	−39%	44 of 221	DNV	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	96.72	24.96	+288%	1,118 of 1,154	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.