Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Nav-Tech BVyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Nav-Tech BV | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 4 |
| CO₂ emitted | 53 kt−41.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 65 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.2% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Nav-Tech BV50.9 (+212% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nav-Tech BV | 2 | 50.9 | +212% | 83 | 14.7 | 5,152 | 3.6% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- Nav-Tech BV59.4 (−38% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nav-Tech BV | 2 | 59.4 | −38% | 42 | 12.2 | 4,913 | 13.6% | 2 / 0 |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nav-Tech BV | DNV (4) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Nav-Tech BV: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELGAFELL | 9306017 | Container | 52.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +220% | 14.7 | 20,097 t | €624k | €89k |
| ARNARFELL | 9306005 | Container | 49.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | +205% | 14.7 | 18,788 t | €647k | €63k |
| SAMSKIP KVITNOSLNG | 9642576 | Ro-ro | 62.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 95.2 | −34% | 12.2 | 6,871 t | €355k | €0 |
| SAMSKIP KVITBJØRNLNG | 9642564 | Ro-ro | 55.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 95.2 | −41% | 12.3 | 6,898 t | €362k | €0 |
30 of 4 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.