Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

KOOL GLACIER

IMO: 9654696
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: GOLAR GLACIER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Cool Company Management AS

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

238.1

LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.95

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+8%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

83.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,333 t

CO₂ emitted

43,973 t

57,253 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

68,595 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,719 h

197 days, 54% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 238.1 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+16%)

147.8Ranks 207 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.6 (−1%)

11.0Faster than 49% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.95 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+8%)

4.54Ranks 175 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU46%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,777 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

730 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

457.2 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+13,280 t

+30.2% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KOOL GLACIER
LNG carrier median

200.0225.0250.0275.0300.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

KOOL GLACIER
LNG carrier median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

KOOL GLACIER
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+7%	+5%	+99%	−1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−3%	+11%	−35%	+21%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.3 kn	−16%	−40%	+381%	+38%	5.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	+26%	+48%	−63%	−51%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Cool Company Management AS	16,333	43,973	68,595	4,719	14.5	238.1	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,695	21,515	34,437	2,322	14.8	223.4	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	12,155	34,458	53,006	4,055	13.1	229.3	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,007	8,288	11,026	599	18.4	272.7	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6,506	17,947	30,115	1,922	15.7	216.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Cool Company Management AS	7.95	7.39	+8%	175 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8.05	9.10	−12%	152 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.66	10.38	−36%	69 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4.82	10.46	−54%	14 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.86	10.71	−8%	115 of 267	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.