Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Cool Company Management AS
Ships8
CO₂ emitted167 kt
Fuel per mile241 kg/nm
Average speed14.3 kn
CO₂ at berth1.9%
Ships burning LNG8
Ships using alternative fuel0
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • Cool Company Management AS7.3 (−1%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG / alt. fuel
Cool Company Management AS87.3−1%24114.32,2341.9%8 / 0
Segment median 7.40%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Cool Company Management ASDNV (8)0%100%100%0%

Cool Company Management AS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSegment medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂AllowancesCost of gap
KOOL CRYSTALLNG9624926LNG carrier10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+36%11.124,647 t€375k€99k
KOOL BALTICLNG9654878LNG carrier8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+18%15.921,722 t€344k€52k
KOOL GLACIERLNG9654696LNG carrier8.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+7%14.543,973 t€683k€48k
KOOL BOREASLNG9654880LNG carrier7.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+4%17.431,318 t€483k€17k
KOOL FROSTLNG9655042LNG carrier7.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−6%12.96,106 t€94k€0
KOOL BLIZZARDLNG9635315LNG carrier7.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−6%13.411,159 t€170k€0
KOOL ORCALNG9870525LNG carrier5.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−24%14.725,857 t€394k€0
KOOL ICELNG9637325LNG carrier4.2 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−43%15.42,334 t€37k€0

30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.