Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Cool Company Management ASyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Cool Company Management AS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 104 kt−37.8% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 184 |
| Average speed | 14.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 1.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 5 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- Cool Company Management AS6.6 (−8% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin LNG carrier | CO₂ per transport work (volume)g/m³·nm, median ship | vs LNG carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cool Company Management AS | 5 | 6.6 | −8% | 184 | 14.3 | 2,916 | 1.8% | 5 / 0 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cool Company Management AS | DNV (5) | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% |
Cool Company Management AS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOOL ICELNG | 9637325 | LNG carrier | 15.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +114% | 12.4 | 11,692 t | €311k | €166k |
| KOOL CRYSTALLNG | 9624926 | LNG carrier | 8.9 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +26% | 15.2 | 8,379 t | €256k | €52k |
| KOOL ORCALNG | 9870525 | LNG carrier | 6.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −8% | 14.7 | 41,565 t | €1.1m | €0 |
| KOOL TIGERLNG | 9976135 | LNG carrier | 5.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −24% | 14.4 | 34,396 t | €920k | €0 |
| KOOL FROSTLNG | 9655042 | LNG carrier | 5.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −25% | 13.6 | 7,935 t | €211k | €0 |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.