Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

KOOL TIGER

IMO
9976135
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 3.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cool Company Management AS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
156.6
LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−18%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
5.39
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (−24%)
Average speed
14.4 kn
LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (+0%)
Fuel per day at sea
54.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,432 t
CO₂ emitted
34,396 t
40,610 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
79,367 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,514 h
230 days, 63% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 156.6 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−18%)
152.1Ranks 52 of 386, lowest first319.4
Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 14.4 (+0%)
11.2Faster than 50% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.39 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−24%)
5.06Ranks 73 of 386, lowest first16.14
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,524 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
650 t
1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
207.9 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq uplift
+6,214 t
+18.1% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGCool Company Management AS12,43234,39679,3675,51414.4156.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGCool Company Management AS5.397.12−24%73 of 386DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

KOOL TIGER (IMO 9976135): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2025–2025 | Navalyze