Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

KOOL BOREAS

IMO
9654880
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG
Former names
SCF MITRE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Cool Company Management AS

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
256.4
LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+25%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
7.67
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+4%)
Average speed
17.4 kn
LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+19%)
Fuel per day at sea
107.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,672 t
CO₂ emitted
31,318 t
40,777 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
45,523 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,609 h
109 days, 30% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 256.4 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+25%)
147.8Ranks 218 of 312, lowest first328.0
Average speedThis ship 17.4 kn · median 14.6 (+19%)
11.0Faster than 98% of LNG carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.67 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+4%)
4.54Ranks 162 of 312, lowest first17.34
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU54%
  • At berth in the EU3%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,114 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
908 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
325.8 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq uplift
+9,459 t
+30.2% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KOOL BOREAS
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • KOOL BOREAS
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • KOOL BOREAS
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024+3.6 kn−26%−6%+332%−38%3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.0 kn+48%+29%+17%+73%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−1.9 kn+22%+9%−23%−56%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021+2.9 kn−22%−7%+231%–2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024LNGCool Company Management AS11,67231,31845,5232,60917.4256.4––
2023LNG / alt.not published3,66310,25910,54276713.8347.5––
2022LNG / alt.not published2,1105,8358,99756915.8234.5––
2021LNG / alt.not published2,2456,22511,63665817.7192.9––
2019LNG / alt.not published8642,3893,51123614.8246.0––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024LNGCool Company Management AS7.677.39+4%162 of 312DNVB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published12.379.10+36%270 of 355DNVB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published7.1410.38−31%92 of 379DNVC
2021LNG / alt.not published16.1410.46+54%245 of 289Indian Register of ShippingB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published––––ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

KOOL BOREAS (IMO 9654880): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2024 | Navalyze