Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CIELO DI GAETA

IMO: 9669653
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,121 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.36 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: d'Amico Tankers D.A.C. · part of d'Amico

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,121 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

103.5 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.16

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+27%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,673 t

CO₂ emitted

14,813 t

15,043 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

45,157 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,151 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 103.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+30%)

52.8Ranks 1,234 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 43% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.16 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+27%)

7.93Ranks 915 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports56%
From the EU12%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU16%

86% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,786 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

15.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CIELO DI GAETA
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CIELO DI GAETA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CIELO DI GAETA
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	+49%	−2%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−0.3 kn	+37%	+33%	+116%	+9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−7%	−5%	−65%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−0%	−2%	−12%	+7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.1 kn	−14%	+41%	+24%	−16%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	+3%	−22%	+10%	+29%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	d'Amico Tankers D.A.C.	4,673	14,813	45,157	4,151	10.9	103.5	19.16	–
2024	d'Amico Tankers D.A.C.	3,566	11,279	30,275	2,997	10.1	117.8	19.64	–
2022	not published	1,206	3,784	14,018	1,348	10.4	86.1	17.98	–
2021	not published	3,725	11,775	40,348	3,942	10.2	92.3	16.74	–
2020	not published	4,247	13,343	45,911	4,390	10.5	92.5	15.67	–
2019	not published	3,996	12,544	37,109	5,816	6.4	107.7	18.60	–
2018	not published	3,524	11,059	33,589	4,009	8.4	104.9	14.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	d'Amico Tankers D.A.C.	19.16	15.04	+27%	915 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	d'Amico Tankers D.A.C.	19.64	16.73	+17%	762 of 1,274	RINA	B
2022	not published	17.98	16.06	+12%	797 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	16.74	16.69	+0%	678 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	15.67	16.16	−3%	621 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	18.60	17.32	+7%	736 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	14.43	17.14	−16%	474 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.