Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CHIOS FREEDOM

IMO
9680255
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
27,451 t
Flag (estimated)
Greece
Port of registry
Chios
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HARBOR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,451 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
63.9
Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−23%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.32
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−7%)
Average speed
9.1 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−15%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,912 t
CO₂ emitted
6,017 t
6,111 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
29,944 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,274 h
136 days, 37% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−23%)
61.0Ranks 509 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 10.7 (−15%)
8.8Faster than 13% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−7%)
4.80Ranks 1,538 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports23%
  • From the EU24%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU4%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,828 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
259 t
4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+94 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CHIOS FREEDOM
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • CHIOS FREEDOM
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CHIOS FREEDOM
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.6 kn−6%−20%+28%−2%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.9 kn+8%+18%+87%+12%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.0 kn−25%−25%−4%−23%Same speed, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.6 kn+16%−1%−39%+8%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.6 kn+4%+11%−33%−12%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.5 kn−8%+7%+192%+13%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+3.3 kn+5%+64%−40%+8%3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025HARBOR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.1,9126,01729,9443,2749.163.97.32–
2024HARBOR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.1,5924,98123,3692,18710.768.17.45–
2023not published7832,47812,4751,2689.862.86.66–
2022not published1,0913,44713,0391,3299.883.78.63–
2021not published1,5444,84521,4211,87511.472.17.96–
2020not published2,2076,98231,9432,96010.869.19.06–
2019not published8212,58010,9401,1829.375.08.03–
2018not published1,2954,07118,2283,0506.071.17.44–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025HARBOR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.7.327.90−7%1,538 of 3,611DNVA
2024HARBOR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.7.458.09−8%1,276 of 3,089DNVA
2023not published6.668.27−19%1,036 of 3,548DNVA
2022not published8.638.71−1%1,952 of 3,968DNVA
2021not published7.968.57−7%1,428 of 3,466DNVA
2020not published9.068.24+10%1,890 of 3,150DNVA
2019not published8.038.38−4%1,546 of 3,360DNVA
2018not published7.448.50−12%1,235 of 3,384DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.