Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TIGER HEBEI

IMO: 9712204
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,331 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.83 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,331 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.7

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

31.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+292%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

746 t

CO₂ emitted

2,354 t

2,390 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,122 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

815 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−1%)

61.0Ranks 1,737 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.7 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 72% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 31.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+292%)

4.80Ranks 3,481 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU54%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,257 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

108 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+36 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIGER HEBEI
Bulk carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIGER HEBEI
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.512.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TIGER HEBEI
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+232%	+233%	+6,510%	+692%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 232%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+0.6 kn	−73%	−71%	−99%	−43%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 73%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−1%	−11%	+13%	+25%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+4%	+23%	+164%	−21%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd	746	2,354	9,122	815	11.2	81.7	31.0	–
2024	Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd	3	11	138	12	11.1	24.6	3.91	–
2022	not published	2,250	7,074	24,515	2,339	10.5	91.8	6.85	–
2021	not published	2,001	6,257	21,610	1,850	11.7	92.6	5.50	–
2020	not published	729	2,296	8,182	830	9.9	89.1	6.97	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd	31.0	7.90	+292%	3,481 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2024	Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd	3.91	8.09	−52%	130 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.85	8.71	−21%	1,095 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	5.50	8.57	−36%	412 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.97	8.24	−15%	1,040 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.