Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TIGER JILIN

IMO
9712216
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
34,395 t
Flag (estimated)
Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EEXI 3.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,395 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
85.4
Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+3%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.83
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−1%)
Average speed
9.2 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−14%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,923 t
CO₂ emitted
6,067 t
6,161 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
22,528 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,461 h
103 days, 28% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+3%)
61.0Ranks 2,019 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 10.7 (−14%)
8.8Faster than 13% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.83 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−1%)
4.80Ranks 1,769 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports22%
  • From the EU34%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU6%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,904 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
385 t
6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+94 t
+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • TIGER JILIN
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • TIGER JILIN
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • TIGER JILIN
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn−10%−15%+27%+2%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.9 kn+18%+8%+182%+38%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−1.7 kn−19%−31%−47%−38%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2022+3.7 kn+1%+46%+473%−9%3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd1,9236,06722,5282,4619.285.47.83–
2024Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd1,6745,23617,7011,8189.794.67.68–
2023not published5011,5626,27059110.680.05.56–
2022not published1,1653,64311,75195212.399.28.93–
2018not published2006272,0512388.697.89.79–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd7.837.90−1%1,769 of 3,611China Classification SocietyA
2024Greathorse International Ship Management Co., Ltd7.688.09−5%1,372 of 3,089China Classification SocietyA
2023not published5.568.27−33%582 of 3,548China Classification SocietyA
2022not published8.938.71+3%2,079 of 3,968China Classification SocietyA
2018not published9.798.50+15%2,149 of 3,384China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.