Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ANSAC WYOMING

IMO
9713777
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
25,695 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.18 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,695 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
57.6
Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−32%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.06
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (−13%)
Average speed
10.7 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,300 t
CO₂ emitted
4,090 t
4,154 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
22,545 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,099 h
87 days, 24% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 57.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−32%)
61.8Ranks 179 of 3,089, lowest first119.4
Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.6 (+1%)
8.8Faster than 54% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.06 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−13%)
4.85Ranks 1,103 of 3,089, lowest first15.76
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports12%
  • From the EU24%
  • Into the EU63%
  • At berth in the EU0%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,338 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0 t
0.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+64 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.1,3004,09022,5452,09910.757.67.06–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.7.068.09−13%1,103 of 3,089ClassNKA+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ANSAC WYOMING (IMO 9713777): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2024–2024 | Navalyze