Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ELISA

IMO: 9730232
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 45,927 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.03 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 45,927 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.7

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−30%)

Average speed

8.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

510 t

CO₂ emitted

1,596 t

1,621 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,319 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

740 h

31 days, 8% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−2%)

61.0Ranks 1,668 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 10.7 (−21%)

8.8Faster than 8% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−30%)

4.80Ranks 639 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU19%
Into the EU73%
At berth in the EU5%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (865 t).

Fuel burned laden

389 t

76% of all fuel; 24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

85 t

5.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+25 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELISA
Bulk carrier median

80.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

ELISA
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELISA
Bulk carrier median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−1.5 kn	−10%	−24%	−61%	−19%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−2%	−13%	−22%	+6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+0%	−5%	+208%	+7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+1%	+7%	−51%	−34%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	+14%	+60%	+105%	+7%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.7 kn	−7%	−37%	−25%	+46%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd	510	1,596	6,319	740	8.5	80.7	5.50	76%
2023	not published	1,453	4,539	16,147	1,615	10.0	90.0	6.83	–
2022	not published	1,913	5,978	20,775	1,861	11.2	92.1	6.44	–
2021	not published	619	1,941	6,744	572	11.8	91.7	6.00	–
2020	not published	1,244	3,926	13,659	1,228	11.1	91.1	9.08	–
2019	not published	534	1,672	6,663	845	7.9	80.2	8.49	59%
2018	not published	767	2,414	8,867	762	11.6	86.5	5.80	92%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd	5.50	7.90	−30%	639 of 3,611	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	6.83	8.27	−17%	1,107 of 3,548	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	6.44	8.71	−26%	885 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	6.00	8.57	−30%	586 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	9.08	8.24	+10%	1,896 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	8.49	8.38	+1%	1,717 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	5.80	8.50	−32%	585 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.