Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ANYA

IMO
9730268
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
30,137 t
Flag (estimated)
Cyprus
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,137 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
89.4
Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+8%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.18
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+16%)
Average speed
10.2 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−5%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
733 t
CO₂ emitted
2,268 t
2,304 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
8,198 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
803 h
33 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+8%)
61.0Ranks 2,333 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)
8.8Faster than 34% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+16%)
4.80Ranks 2,344 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports3%
  • From the EU52%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU2%

49% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,106 t).

Fuel burned laden
498 t
68% of all fuel; 32% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
56 t
2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+36 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ANYA
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • ANYA
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ANYA
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.0 kn−1%−10%−76%+20%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.3 kn+0%−10%+227%−14%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn−4%−6%+4%−7%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.8 kn+0%+7%−25%+35%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.6 kn+4%+10%+35%−21%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+2.2 kn+5%+30%−22%+55%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.1 kn+0%−18%−0%−36%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Bio blendLemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd7332,2688,19880310.289.49.1868%
2024Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd3,0219,42033,5562,98811.290.07.67–
2023not published9212,87110,25482012.589.88.8887%
2022not published9172,8599,83876912.893.29.5480%
2021not published1,2153,78713,0851,08712.092.87.07–
2020not published8602,6969,67084811.488.98.95–
2019not published1,0493,28212,3971,3459.284.65.7991%
2018not published1,0473,27112,4321,10411.384.29.0677%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Bio blendLemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd9.187.90+16%2,344 of 3,611ABSA+B+C
2024Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd7.678.09−5%1,365 of 3,089ABSA+B+C
2023not published8.888.27+7%2,019 of 3,548VerifaviaA
2022not published9.548.71+10%2,329 of 3,968VerifaviaA
2021not published7.078.57−18%1,026 of 3,466VerifaviaA
2020not published8.958.24+9%1,843 of 3,150VerifaviaA
2019not published5.798.38−31%605 of 3,360VerifaviaA
2018not published9.068.50+7%1,902 of 3,384VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.