Navalyze · Container · Ship

TIHAMA

IMO: 9736107
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 140,166 t
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 140,166 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

335.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+90%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.47

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−54%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

128.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

28,204 t

CO₂ emitted

87,951 t

89,336 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

84,000 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,250 h

219 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 335.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+90%)

78.8Ranks 2,122 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.47 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−54%)

7.22Ranks 258 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU49%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

49% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (43,519 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

1.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TIHAMA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIHAMA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TIHAMA
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	+28%	+55%	+113%	−9%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+1%	−7%	+7%	+50%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	+50%	+70%	+14%	+36%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−42%	−38%	−17%	−39%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.2 kn	−5%	−30%	−48%	+7%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−6%	+4%	+23%	−12%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+9%	+3%	−7%	−5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	28,204	87,951	84,000	5,250	16.0	335.8	7.47	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	10,341	32,318	39,366	2,992	13.2	262.7	8.23	–
2023LNG	not published	9,573	24,215	36,683	2,565	14.3	261.0	5.49	–
2022LNG	not published	5,582	15,691	32,115	2,542	12.6	173.8	4.03	–
2021	not published	11,600	36,301	38,909	3,275	11.9	298.1	6.58	–
2020	not published	23,564	74,414	75,187	4,684	16.1	313.4	6.15	–
2019	not published	20,370	63,694	60,955	4,228	14.4	334.2	7.01	–
2018	not published	20,131	62,948	65,451	4,318	15.2	307.6	7.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.47	16.30	−54%	258 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.23	17.52	−53%	294 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG	not published	5.49	19.40	−72%	21 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022LNG	not published	4.03	19.13	−79%	4 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.58	17.90	−63%	109 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.15	17.58	−65%	84 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.01	18.88	−63%	118 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.41	20.22	−63%	92 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.