Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

IONIC PRIDE

IMO: 9749300
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 39,045 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: IONIC BULK CARRIERS (MGT) INC. · part of Ionic Shipping

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,045 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.1

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.72

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−2%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,459 t

CO₂ emitted

7,717 t

7,838 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,601 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,275 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+16%)

61.0Ranks 2,737 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.7 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 75% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.72 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−2%)

4.80Ranks 1,730 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU34%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU4%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,759 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

323 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+121 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

IONIC PRIDE
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

IONIC PRIDE
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

IONIC PRIDE
Bulk carrier median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	+294%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+49%	+36%	+14%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 49%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−24%	−19%	−88%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−7%	−12%	+385%	+69%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−2%	+3%	−51%	−20%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+1%	+4%	−4%	−52%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−7%	−13%	+38%	+70%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	IONIC BULK CARRIERS (MGT) INC.	2,459	7,717	25,601	2,275	11.3	96.1	7.72	–
2024	IONIC BULK CARRIERS (MGT) INC.	635	1,986	6,490	569	11.4	97.8	–	–
2023	not published	376	1,179	5,708	458	12.5	65.8	–	–
2022	not published	4,146	13,064	47,785	4,080	11.7	86.8	6.00	–
2021	not published	923	2,877	9,854	802	12.3	93.6	3.54	–
2020	not published	1,936	6,105	20,195	1,725	11.7	95.9	4.44	–
2019	not published	2,002	6,259	21,078	1,863	11.3	95.0	9.31	–
2018	not published	1,567	4,952	15,252	1,272	12.0	103	5.47	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	IONIC BULK CARRIERS (MGT) INC.	7.72	7.90	−2%	1,730 of 3,611	ClassNK	A
2024	IONIC BULK CARRIERS (MGT) INC.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	6.00	8.71	−31%	710 of 3,968	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	3.54	8.57	−59%	52 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	4.44	8.24	−46%	170 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	9.31	8.38	+11%	2,043 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	5.47	8.50	−36%	494 of 3,384	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.