Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ULTRA CRIMSON

IMO: 9757826
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 53,636 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.17 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,636 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.4

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.37

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (−46%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,099 t

CO₂ emitted

3,461 t

3,515 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,764 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,316 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.4 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−12%)

61.8Ranks 948 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 73% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−46%)

4.85Ranks 213 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU22%
Into the EU76%
At berth in the EU0%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,799 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0 t

0.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+54 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ULTRA CRIMSON
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ULTRA CRIMSON
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ULTRA CRIMSON
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−7%	−16%	−67%	−42%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+12%	+10%	+71%	−37%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+0.6 kn	−18%	−13%	−18%	+78%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	−1%	+19%	+7%	+16%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+5%	+25%	−2%	−18%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	1,099	3,461	14,764	1,316	11.2	74.4	4.37	–
2023	not published	3,619	11,450	45,231	3,660	12.4	80.0	7.48	–
2022	not published	1,886	5,947	26,483	2,105	12.6	71.2	11.84	–
2020	not published	2,784	8,752	32,213	2,693	12.0	86.4	6.67	–
2019	not published	2,650	8,300	30,201	3,052	9.9	87.7	5.74	91%
2018	not published	2,580	8,085	30,760	3,717	8.3	83.9	7.01	84%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MARUFLEET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	4.37	8.09	−46%	213 of 3,089	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	7.48	8.27	−10%	1,430 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	11.84	8.71	+36%	2,972 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	6.67	8.24	−19%	913 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.74	8.38	−32%	585 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.01	8.50	−18%	1,046 of 3,384	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.