Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

HSL TAMPA

IMO: 9781035
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 43,672 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BAHIA BLANCA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 43,672 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.0

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.15

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−22%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,324 t

CO₂ emitted

4,138 t

4,203 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,406 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,419 h

59 days, 16% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+4%)

61.0Ranks 2,072 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 58% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.15 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−22%)

4.80Ranks 953 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU30%
Into the EU68%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,119 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

99 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+65 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HSL TAMPA
Bulk carrier median

70.075.080.085.090.095.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HSL TAMPA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HSL TAMPA
Bulk carrier median

4.05.06.07.08.09.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+5%	−6%	−13%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+1%	+6%	+2%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+20%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.3 kn	+5%	+90%	+32%	+45%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.8 kn	−19%	−49%	−63%	+1%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	1,324	4,138	15,406	1,419	10.9	86.0	6.15	–
2024	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	1,450	4,537	17,714	1,460	12.1	81.9	–	–
2023	not published	1,408	4,448	17,439	1,510	11.6	80.8	6.09	–
2021	not published	1,137	3,592	14,568	1,249	11.7	78.1	7.12	–
2020	not published	823	2,601	11,063	1,721	6.4	74.4	4.90	–
2019	not published	2,781	8,693	30,087	2,964	10.2	92.4	4.85	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	6.15	7.89	−22%	953 of 3,610	ClassNK	A+C
2024	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+C
2023	not published	6.09	8.27	−26%	791 of 3,548	ClassNK	A+C
2021	not published	7.12	8.57	−17%	1,050 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+C
2020	not published	4.90	8.24	−41%	249 of 3,150	ClassNK	A+C
2019	not published	4.85	8.38	−42%	323 of 3,360	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.