Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

DANCING BRAVE

IMO
9798179
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
6,590 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 9.33 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: New Dancing Brave Shipping PTE. LTD.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,590 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
60.6
Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−26%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
28.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.6 (−19%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,658 t
CO₂ emitted
14,592 t
14,821 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
76,837 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,900 h
246 days, 67% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 60.6 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−26%)
49.8Ranks 62 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 12.6 (+3%)
8.8Faster than 56% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−19%)
14.4Ranks 152 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports2%
  • From the EU51%
  • Into the EU45%
  • At berth in the EU2%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,587 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
220 t
1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+229 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • DANCING BRAVE
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • DANCING BRAVE
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • DANCING BRAVE
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.6 kn−6%−1%−14%−9%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.1 kn−4%−4%+156%−18%Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.4 kn−12%−10%−29%+12%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.4 kn−13%−22%+83%−14%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.4 kn+15%+27%+112%−50%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+3.4 kn−8%+28%+12%+239%3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−4.9 kn+15%−27%−46%−79%4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025New Dancing Brave Shipping PTE. LTD.4,65814,59276,8375,90013.060.628.8–
2024New Dancing Brave Shipping PTE. LTD.5,70417,93788,8677,17412.464.231.7–
2023not published2,3157,25134,7672,78912.566.638.5–
2022not published3,72611,78248,9674,06112.176.134.562%
2021not published2,3307,35926,7861,98813.587.040.075%
2020not published9583,02612,6361,04212.175.880.545%
2019not published9252,89611,2371,2948.782.323.7100%
2018not published1,5084,71120,9861,54213.671.811521%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025New Dancing Brave Shipping PTE. LTD.28.835.6−19%152 of 355DNVB+C
2024New Dancing Brave Shipping PTE. LTD.31.735.8−12%137 of 306DNVB+C
2023not published38.541.8−8%153 of 330DNVB+C
2022not published34.542.5−19%152 of 348ABSB+C
2021not published40.046.9−15%139 of 323ABSC
2020not published80.542.3+90%254 of 339ABSC
2019not published23.745.9−48%76 of 331ABSC
2018not published11553.1+116%241 of 297ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.