Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SANDVIKEN

IMO: 9803649
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,339 t
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEDI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VIKEN CRUDE AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,339 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.5

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

68.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+761%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,129 t

CO₂ emitted

6,762 t

6,866 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,758 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,263 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.5 kg/nm · median 129 (−27%)

76.1Ranks 361 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.0Faster than 31% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 68.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+761%)

4.51Ranks 1,645 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports65%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU35%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,762 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,353 t

34.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+104 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SANDVIKEN
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SANDVIKEN
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SANDVIKEN
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+21%	+18%	−31%	+37%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−37%	−38%	+39%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+26%	+14%	−30%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	−18%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−36%	−34%	+132%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+1%	+6%	−13%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+5.3 kn	+42%	+186%	+9%	–	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VIKEN CRUDE AS	2,129	6,762	22,758	2,263	10.1	93.5	68.5	–
2024	VIKEN CRUDE AS	2,552	8,109	32,971	3,200	10.3	77.4	50.2	–
2023	not published	2,926	9,298	23,649	2,265	10.4	124	94.5	–
2022	not published	3,334	10,606	33,942	2,955	11.5	98.2	63.1	–
2021	not published	3,802	12,108	41,408	3,580	11.6	91.8	59.0	–
2020	not published	2,569	8,155	17,879	1,605	11.1	144	101	–
2019	not published	2,933	9,298	20,562	1,941	10.6	143	97.8	–
2018	not published	1,903	6,004	18,896	3,590	5.3	101	47.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VIKEN CRUDE AS	68.5	7.95	+761%	1,645 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	VIKEN CRUDE AS	50.2	8.06	+522%	1,735 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	–
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	63.1	8.51	+642%	1,926 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	59.0	8.86	+566%	1,751 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	47.0	8.86	+431%	1,717 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.