Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SKUTEVIKEN

IMO: 9803651
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,815 t
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEDI 9.83 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VIKEN CRUDE AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,815 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.2

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

61.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+672%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,974 t

CO₂ emitted

6,254 t

6,351 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,175 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,941 h

81 days, 22% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.2 kg/nm · median 129 (−27%)

76.1Ranks 355 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.0Faster than 56% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+672%)

4.51Ranks 1,632 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports65%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU35%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,254 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,186 t

34.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+97 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SKUTEVIKEN
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SKUTEVIKEN
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SKUTEVIKEN
Oil tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+19%	+20%	−30%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−31%	−32%	+32%	−32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+11%	+16%	−25%	+37%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+14%	+7%	−30%	+21%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−35%	−30%	+123%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+6%	+11%	−6%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.4 kn	+32%	+74%	−1%	+118%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VIKEN CRUDE AS	1,974	6,254	21,175	1,941	10.9	93.2	61.3	–
2024	VIKEN CRUDE AS	2,353	7,476	30,143	2,765	10.9	78.0	61.3	–
2023	not published	2,588	8,212	22,864	2,068	11.1	113	89.8	–
2022	not published	3,089	9,807	30,337	2,859	10.6	102	65.4	–
2021	not published	3,862	12,323	43,107	3,852	11.2	89.6	54.2	–
2020	not published	2,639	8,379	19,298	1,849	10.4	137	91.0	–
2019	not published	2,647	8,389	20,423	2,054	9.9	130	86.0	–
2018	not published	2,036	6,424	20,683	2,750	7.5	98.5	39.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VIKEN CRUDE AS	61.3	7.95	+672%	1,632 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	VIKEN CRUDE AS	61.3	8.06	+661%	1,758 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	–
2023	not published	89.8	8.44	+964%	1,797 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	65.4	8.51	+669%	1,932 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	54.2	8.86	+512%	1,744 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	86.0	8.83	+874%	1,913 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	39.4	8.86	+345%	1,706 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.