Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PROTEUS

IMO
9864368
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
24,112 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Empire Navigation Inc

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,112 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
100.8
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+26%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.17
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−12%)
Average speed
10.9 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−2%)
Fuel per day at sea
26.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
622 t
CO₂ emitted
1,959 t
1,989 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
6,168 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
567 h
24 days, 6% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 100.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+26%)
52.8Ranks 1,186 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)
8.8Faster than 44% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−12%)
7.93Ranks 596 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports52%
  • From the EU36%
  • Into the EU5%
  • At berth in the EU8%

46% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (901 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • PROTEUS
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • PROTEUS
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • PROTEUS
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2025−0.2 kn−41%−42%−24%−63%Same speed, fuel per mile down 41%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.0 kn+38%+38%−22%+238%Same speed, fuel per mile up 38%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.1 kn+52%+53%−8%−22%Same speed, fuel per mile up 52%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.9 kn−18%−10%−74%+37%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Empire Navigation Inc6221,9596,16856710.9100.813.17–
2023not published1,3824,3218,14673711.1169.735.22–
2022not published1,2764,00210,40693611.1122.710.43–
2021not published9152,85611,3091,02611.080.913.45–
2020not published4,24113,26442,8214,26010.199.09.82–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Empire Navigation Inc13.1715.04−12%596 of 1,460DNVB
2023not published35.2216.23+117%1,099 of 1,314Lloyd's RegisterB
2022not published10.4316.06−35%255 of 1,409DNVB
2021not published13.4516.69−19%447 of 1,343DNVB
2020not published9.8216.16−39%167 of 1,312ABSB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

PROTEUS (IMO 9864368): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2025 | Navalyze