Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

PACIFIC MERMAID

IMO: 9045924
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,008 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 21.06 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V. · part of Seatrade

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,008 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.7 kg/nm

Reefer median 82.9 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

66.30

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 56.80 (+17%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Reefer median 14.6 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

857 t

CO₂ emitted

2,720 t

2,762 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,236 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

806 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.7 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+1%)

55.8Ranks 58 of 109, lowest first117.7

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 14.6 (−13%)

8.2Faster than 34% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 66.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.80 (+17%)

36.74Ranks 74 of 109, lowest first140.03

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU63%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU21%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,755 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

20.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PACIFIC MERMAID
Reefer median

60.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PACIFIC MERMAID
Reefer median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PACIFIC MERMAID
Reefer median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+13%	+24%	−33%	−39%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.9 kn	+14%	−9%	−48%	+172%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−19%	−26%	+32%	−33%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+10%	+9%	−18%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+12%	+11%	+94%	−71%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−14%	−17%	−3%	+272%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−5%	−8%	−43%	−5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	857	2,720	10,236	806	12.7	83.7	66.30	–
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	1,133	3,577	15,301	1,319	11.6	74.1	108.80	–
2023	not published	1,931	6,059	29,656	2,047	14.5	65.1	39.97	–
2022	not published	1,805	5,676	22,430	1,418	15.8	80.5	60.05	–
2021	not published	1,991	6,215	27,231	1,713	15.9	73.1	57.17	–
2020	not published	917	2,868	14,026	874	16.0	65.4	194.79	–
2019	not published	1,104	3,458	14,513	876	16.6	76.1	52.43	–
2018	not published	2,041	6,378	25,455	1,494	17.0	80.2	55.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	66.30	56.80	+17%	74 of 109	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	108.80	58.69	+85%	93 of 108	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	39.97	55.59	−28%	22 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	60.05	55.27	+9%	85 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	57.17	54.99	+4%	84 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	194.79	59.07	+230%	144 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	52.43	62.58	−16%	47 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	55.22	72.84	−24%	38 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.