Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

BH OCEAN

IMO
9218416
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
5,200 t
Flag (estimated)
Panama
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.39 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
FEDERAL YOSHINO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: United Marine Muhendislik San.Tic.Ltd. Sti.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,200 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
50.8
Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−38%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
31.2
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+295%)
Average speed
11.3 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+6%)
Fuel per day at sea
13.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
293 t
CO₂ emitted
935 t
949 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
5,760 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
512 h
21 days, 6% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 50.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−38%)
61.0Ranks 94 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.7 (+6%)
8.8Faster than 75% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 31.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+295%)
4.80Ranks 3,481 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU75%
  • Into the EU14%
  • At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (519 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
42 t
4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+14 t
+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BH OCEAN
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • BH OCEAN
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BH OCEAN
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.5 kn−18%−14%−86%+208%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+0.1 kn+3%+5%+30%−6%Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.4 kn−0%−4%+38%−6%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.3 kn−20%−23%−26%−11%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.1 kn+13%+15%+77%+29%Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.2 kn+1%+13%−13%+7%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.0 kn−4%−13%−11%−28%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025United Marine Muhendislik San.Tic.Ltd. Sti.2939355,76051211.350.831.2–
2024Baffin Investments Limited2,5007,90940,4423,75310.861.810.186%
2023not published1,8685,92131,1862,92410.759.910.883%
2022not published1,3644,33222,6522,04911.160.211.484%
2021not published2,2917,26230,4142,66211.475.312.885%
2020not published1,1463,60917,2211,52611.366.59.9585%
2019not published1,3094,11419,8221,96310.166.09.2778%
2018not published1,5374,83022,2742,00611.169.013.067%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025United Marine Muhendislik San.Tic.Ltd. Sti.31.27.90+295%3,481 of 3,611Polish Register of ShippingB
2024Baffin Investments Limited10.18.09+25%2,175 of 3,089ABSB+C
2023not published10.88.27+30%2,540 of 3,548ABSC
2022not published11.48.71+31%2,881 of 3,968ABSC
2021not published12.88.57+49%2,887 of 3,466ABSC
2020not published9.958.24+21%2,155 of 3,150ABSC
2019not published9.278.38+11%2,023 of 3,360ABSC
2018not published13.08.50+52%2,812 of 3,384ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.