Navalyze · Container · Ship

ODYSSEY

IMO: 9252773
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,309 t
Flag (estimated): Latvia
Port of registry: Riga
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FLENSBURG, NCL SALTEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS"Elbloader"GMBH&Co.KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,309 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.9

Container median 177 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

43.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+168%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,050 t

CO₂ emitted

12,888 t

13,087 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

55,580 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,019 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.9 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 139 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+168%)

7.22Ranks 1,941 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU3%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU8%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,864 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,066 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+199 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ODYSSEY
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ODYSSEY
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ODYSSEY
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	−6%	−16%	−16%	−16%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+4%	+2%	−15%	+7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.2 kn	−2%	+23%	+380%	−10%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−1.1 kn	−10%	−18%	+9%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	−59%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−15%	−19%	−31%	+10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MS"Elbloader"GMBH&Co.KG	237	754	3,301	218	15.1	71.8	48.6	–
2025	Baltnautic Shipmanagement Ltd	4,050	12,888	55,580	4,019	13.8	72.9	43.7	–
2024	MS"Elbloader"GMBH&Co.KG	5,113	16,197	65,859	4,280	15.4	77.6	52.2	–
2023	not published	5,763	18,242	77,458	4,908	15.8	74.4	49.0	–
2022	not published	1,232	3,892	16,138	1,285	12.6	76.3	54.8	–
2020	not published	1,259	3,968	14,849	1,084	13.7	84.8	190	–
2019	not published	3,170	10,091	36,513	2,579	14.2	86.8	74.4	–
2018	not published	5,395	17,293	52,693	3,577	14.7	102	67.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MS"Elbloader"GMBH&Co.KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A
2025	Baltnautic Shipmanagement Ltd	43.7	16.3	+168%	1,941 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MS"Elbloader"GMBH&Co.KG	52.2	17.5	+198%	1,790 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	49.0	19.4	+153%	1,667 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	54.8	19.1	+186%	1,666 of 1,825	DNV	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	B
2019	not published	74.4	18.9	+294%	1,731 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	67.5	20.2	+234%	1,615 of 1,705	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.