Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ANGELINA AMORETTI

IMO: 9279202
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 6,557 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Catania
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,557 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

115

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

55.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+233%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,412 t

CO₂ emitted

7,661 t

7,779 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

20,996 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,112 h

88 days, 24% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 115 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+42%)

53.8Ranks 1,177 of 1,274, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 11.0 (−10%)

8.7Faster than 25% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (+233%)

8.47Ranks 1,220 of 1,274, lowest first42.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports49%
From the EU16%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU23%

86% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,574 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,734 t

22.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+118 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANGELINA AMORETTI
Chemical tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ANGELINA AMORETTI
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANGELINA AMORETTI
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	+5%	−10%	−20%	+26%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+6%	+7%	+7%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−11%	−11%	−3%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−13%	−3%	+31%	−8%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+6.0 kn	−12%	+108%	+9%	−29%	6.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+11%	−4%	−14%	+15%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA	1,877	6,011	14,092	1,458	9.7	133	50.3	–
2024	ME Marittima Emiliana SpA	2,412	7,661	20,996	2,112	9.9	115	55.7	–
2023	not published	2,856	8,999	26,203	2,258	11.6	109	44.3	–
2022	not published	2,515	7,921	24,567	2,124	11.6	102	39.5	–
2021	not published	2,892	9,108	25,217	2,175	11.6	115	41.8	–
2020	not published	2,533	8,098	19,240	1,844	10.4	132	45.3	–
2019	not published	2,634	8,364	17,644	3,975	4.4	149	64.2	–
2018	not published	2,774	8,809	20,609	4,025	5.1	135	56.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	ME MARITTIMA EMILIANA SPA	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	ME Marittima Emiliana SpA	55.7	16.7	+233%	1,220 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	44.3	16.2	+173%	1,189 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	39.5	16.1	+146%	1,255 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	41.8	16.7	+150%	1,211 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	45.3	16.2	+180%	1,221 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	64.2	17.3	+271%	1,288 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	56.0	17.1	+227%	1,229 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.