Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

GIULIA IEVOLI

IMO: 9284439
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,145 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Cagliari
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.22 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARNAVI SPA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,145 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.1

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

71.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+374%)

Average speed

9.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,964 t

CO₂ emitted

9,354 t

9,500 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,705 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,645 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−11%)

52.8Ranks 524 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 11.1 (−19%)

8.8Faster than 11% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 71.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+374%)

7.93Ranks 1,431 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports69%
From the EU9%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU9%

89% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,326 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

844 t

9.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+146 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GIULIA IEVOLI
Chemical tanker median

70.075.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GIULIA IEVOLI
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GIULIA IEVOLI
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−12%	−22%	+9%	+59%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	−1%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+5%	+12%	−10%	+64%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+5%	+21%	+36%	+2%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−6%	−10%	−21%	+9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	+0%	−11%	+6%	−22%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.5 kn	−4%	+50%	+13%	−16%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MARNAVI SPA	2,964	9,354	41,705	4,645	9.0	71.1	71.3	–
2024	MARNAVI SPA	3,117	9,795	38,374	3,820	10.0	81.2	44.8	–
2023	not published	3,335	10,462	38,748	3,828	10.1	86.1	68.1	–
2022	not published	3,518	11,064	43,030	4,532	9.5	81.8	41.5	–
2021	not published	2,460	7,728	31,581	3,842	8.2	77.9	40.6	–
2020	not published	3,296	10,351	39,728	4,618	8.6	83.0	37.3	–
2019	not published	3,101	9,727	37,431	3,857	9.7	82.8	47.6	–
2018	not published	2,869	9,009	33,137	5,321	6.2	86.6	56.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARNAVI SPA	71.3	15.0	+374%	1,431 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	MARNAVI SPA	44.8	16.7	+168%	1,168 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	68.1	16.2	+320%	1,282 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	41.5	16.1	+158%	1,279 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	40.6	16.7	+143%	1,205 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	37.3	16.2	+131%	1,147 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	47.6	17.3	+175%	1,227 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	56.5	17.1	+230%	1,232 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.