Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ANDREA VICTORY

IMO: 9288849
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,759 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: WA TANKERS AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,759 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.0

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+0%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,261 t

CO₂ emitted

10,425 t

10,585 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,277 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,947 h

123 days, 34% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+23%)

52.8Ranks 1,139 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 56% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+0%)

7.93Ranks 734 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU29%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU15%

74% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,763 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,546 t

14.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+160 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANDREA VICTORY
Chemical tanker median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANDREA VICTORY
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANDREA VICTORY
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−9%	−14%	+13%	−13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+6%	+8%	+30%	+33%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	−3%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	+0.8 kn	−38%	−33%	+63%	−26%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+45%	+68%	−47%	+11%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 45%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−4.6 kn	+2%	−31%	−19%	−17%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	WA TANKERS AS	3,261	10,425	33,277	2,947	11.3	98.0	15.1	–
2024	WA TANKERS AS	3,172	9,999	29,555	2,470	12.0	107	17.3	–
2023	not published	2,288	7,198	22,671	1,937	11.7	101	13.0	–
2022	not published	2,425	7,626	23,341	1,976	11.8	104	10.4	–
2020	not published	2,406	7,604	14,332	1,305	11.0	168	14.1	–
2019	not published	3,154	9,895	27,199	2,881	9.4	116	12.8	–
2018	not published	3,840	12,049	33,673	2,405	14.0	114	15.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	WA TANKERS AS	15.1	15.0	+0%	734 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	WA TANKERS AS	17.3	16.7	+3%	665 of 1,274	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.0	16.2	−20%	440 of 1,314	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	10.4	16.1	−35%	249 of 1,409	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	14.1	16.2	−13%	504 of 1,312	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	12.8	17.3	−26%	373 of 1,321	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	15.4	17.1	−10%	528 of 1,294	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.