Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SPAR LYNX

IMO: 9289025
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 37,577 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spar Shipping A/S

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 37,577 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

87.0

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.25

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (−10%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,274 t

CO₂ emitted

3,991 t

4,054 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,651 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,310 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.0 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+3%)

61.8Ranks 1,699 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 72% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−10%)

4.85Ranks 1,183 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU30%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,091 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPAR LYNX
Bulk carrier median

80.085.090.095.0100.0105.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SPAR LYNX
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SPAR LYNX
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	−16%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−9%	−10%	−32%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−0%	−3%	−14%	−4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	+5%	+33%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−9%	−1%	+27%	−53%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+4%	+1%	−13%	+59%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Spar Shipping A/S	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	1,274	3,991	14,651	1,310	11.2	87.0	7.25	–
2023	not published	1,475	4,629	17,364	1,562	11.1	85.0	6.99	87%
2022	not published	2,396	7,552	25,552	2,273	11.2	93.8	7.74	–
2021	not published	2,795	8,746	29,753	2,577	11.5	93.9	8.07	–
2020	not published	2,623	8,247	28,288	2,367	12.0	92.7	6.09	–
2019	not published	2,253	7,032	22,193	2,012	11.0	101.5	12.87	–
2018	not published	2,476	7,725	25,451	2,236	11.4	97.3	8.10	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Spar Shipping A/S	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	7.25	8.09	−10%	1,183 of 3,089	DNV	C
2023	not published	6.99	8.27	−15%	1,185 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	7.74	8.71	−11%	1,496 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.07	8.57	−6%	1,473 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.09	8.24	−26%	655 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.87	8.38	+54%	2,789 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.10	8.50	−5%	1,536 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.