Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

FUTURA

IMO: 9293961
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 18,756 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Bari
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.53 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Millenia Maritime Inc

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,756 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

103

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+16%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,695 t

CO₂ emitted

8,584 t

8,716 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,197 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,567 h

107 days, 29% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+29%)

52.8Ranks 1,225 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 11.1 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 28% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+16%)

7.93Ranks 847 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU42%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU9%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,263 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

776 t

9.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+132 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FUTURA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FUTURA
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FUTURA
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−15%	−15%	+61%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−7%	−4%	−57%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+51%	+43%	−12%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 51%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−12%	−5%	+74%	+34%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−8%	−10%	−26%	+10%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−1%	+7%	−21%	−27%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−9%	−18%	+147%	+34%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Millenia Maritime Inc	2,695	8,584	26,197	2,567	10.2	103	17.5	–
2024	Millenia Maritime Inc	1,961	6,168	16,281	1,577	10.3	120	22.6	46%
2023	not published	4,860	15,245	37,560	3,765	10.0	129	22.3	–
2022	not published	3,661	11,524	42,614	4,058	10.5	85.9	22.7	–
2021	not published	2,392	7,565	24,434	2,510	9.7	97.9	16.9	–
2020	not published	3,513	11,123	33,116	3,305	10.0	106	15.4	–
2019	not published	4,522	14,171	42,012	4,566	9.2	108	21.0	–
2018	not published	2,013	6,295	17,040	1,655	10.3	118	15.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Millenia Maritime Inc	17.5	15.0	+16%	847 of 1,460	RINA	A
2024	Millenia Maritime Inc	22.6	16.7	+35%	838 of 1,274	RINA	–
2023	not published	22.3	16.2	+37%	862 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	22.7	16.1	+41%	992 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	16.9	16.7	+1%	690 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	15.4	16.2	−5%	597 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	21.0	17.3	+21%	843 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	15.7	17.1	−8%	547 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.