Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LIBERA

IMO
9293973
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
15,020 t
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.53 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Medcare Shipping SA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,020 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
87.4
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+10%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+22%)
Average speed
9.9 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
20.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,927 t
CO₂ emitted
9,204 t
9,348 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
33,486 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,366 h
140 days, 38% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+10%)
52.8Ranks 927 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 11.1 (−11%)
8.8Faster than 23% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+22%)
7.93Ranks 888 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports44%
  • From the EU20%
  • Into the EU23%
  • At berth in the EU12%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,868 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,099 t
11.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+144 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LIBERA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • LIBERA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LIBERA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.1 kn−23%−23%+16%+4%Same speed, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.2 kn+9%+7%−19%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−1.1 kn+10%−0%+11%+0%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+2.8 kn+10%+46%+48%+6%2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−1.6 kn−19%−32%−21%−8%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+2.5 kn+24%+63%−6%+19%2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.3 kn−19%−16%+48%−39%Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Medcare Shipping SA2,9279,20433,4863,3669.987.418.3–
2024Medcare Shipping SA3,26110,26428,8632,87510.011317.7–
2023not published3,68511,55935,4313,46910.210417.8–
2022not published3,0329,51132,0252,84111.394.717.7–
2021not published1,8575,82621,5732,5498.586.116.7–
2020not published2,8909,09727,2412,68610.110618.3–
2019not published2,4787,77128,8633,7747.685.915.3–
2018not published2,0706,48219,4552,6537.310625.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Medcare Shipping SA18.315.0+22%888 of 1,460ICS Verification ServicesA
2024Medcare Shipping SA17.716.7+6%687 of 1,274ICS Verification ServicesA
2023not published17.816.2+10%719 of 1,314ICS Verification ServicesA
2022not published17.716.1+10%786 of 1,409ICS Verification ServicesA
2021not published16.716.7+0%678 of 1,343ICS Verification ServicesA
2020not published18.316.2+13%781 of 1,312ICS Verification ServicesA
2019not published15.317.3−11%535 of 1,321ICS Verification ServicesA
2018not published25.117.1+47%949 of 1,294ICS Verification ServicesA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.