Navalyze · Container · Ship

ALANA

IMO: 9297589
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,592 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,592 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.5

Container median 177 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+152%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,924 t

CO₂ emitted

9,254 t

9,398 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

40,306 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,829 h

160 days, 44% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 132 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 13.3 (−21%)

9.1Faster than 18% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+152%)

7.22Ranks 1,897 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU28%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,075 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

487 t

5.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+144 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALANA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALANA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALANA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+22%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−4%	−11%	−21%	−8%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−8%	+1%	+8%	+0%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+4%	+15%	−12%	+3%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+9%	+2%	−8%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.2 kn	−1%	−19%	−10%	+23%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	−8%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	2,924	9,254	40,306	3,829	10.5	72.5	41.1	–
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	2,487	7,777	33,072	3,141	10.5	75.2	34.6	–
2023	not published	3,262	10,187	41,766	3,660	11.4	78.1	37.8	–
2022	not published	3,289	10,323	38,805	3,738	10.4	84.8	37.7	–
2021	not published	3,603	11,479	44,237	4,713	9.4	81.5	36.5	–
2020	not published	3,587	11,257	48,150	4,782	10.1	74.5	36.7	–
2019	not published	4,015	12,570	53,566	4,362	12.3	75.0	29.9	–
2018	not published	4,542	14,185	58,043	4,787	12.1	78.2	29.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	41.1	16.3	+152%	1,897 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	34.6	17.5	+97%	1,542 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	37.8	19.4	+95%	1,504 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	37.7	19.1	+97%	1,445 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	36.5	17.9	+104%	1,430 of 1,781	RINA	–
2020	not published	36.7	17.6	+109%	1,430 of 1,797	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	29.9	18.9	+58%	1,259 of 1,788	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	29.8	20.2	+48%	1,166 of 1,705	RINA	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.