Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CUMBRIAN

IMO: 9298404
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,734 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CUMBRIAN FISHER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Alfa Masters Denizcilik AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,734 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

47.5

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+15%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,008 t

CO₂ emitted

3,190 t

3,240 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,198 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,972 h

82 days, 23% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 47.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−40%)

52.8Ranks 77 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 11.1 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 40% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+15%)

7.93Ranks 832 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU28%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU3%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,786 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

108 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+50 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CUMBRIAN
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CUMBRIAN
Chemical tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CUMBRIAN
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−14%	−5%	−18%	−53%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−14%	−15%	+116%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+6.0 kn	+13%	+189%	+54%	−23%	6.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−7.2 kn	−40%	−79%	−17%	−22%	7.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	+3%	+75%	+17%	−12%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	+42%	−3%	−6%	+58%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 42%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Alfa Masters Denizcilik AS	1,008	3,190	21,198	1,972	10.8	47.5	17.2	–
2024part-year	James Fisher (Shipping Services) Limited	1,430	4,585	25,761	2,641	9.8	55.5	36.9	–
2024	Alfa Masters Denizcilik AS	1,430	4,585	25,761	2,641	9.8	55.5	36.9	–
2023	not published	770	2,469	11,936	1,209	9.9	64.5	30.6	–
2022	not published	440	1,411	7,726	2,002	3.9	57.0	39.8	–
2020	not published	879	2,818	9,254	836	11.1	95.0	51.3	–
2019	not published	729	2,339	7,907	1,220	6.5	92.2	58.1	–
2018	not published	548	1,758	8,421	887	9.5	65.1	36.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Alfa Masters Denizcilik AS	17.2	15.0	+15%	832 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	A
2024part-year	James Fisher (Shipping Services) Limited	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2024	Alfa Masters Denizcilik AS	36.9	16.7	+121%	1,085 of 1,274	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	30.6	16.2	+88%	1,031 of 1,314	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	39.8	16.1	+148%	1,258 of 1,409	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	51.3	16.2	+217%	1,248 of 1,312	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	58.1	17.3	+235%	1,271 of 1,321	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	36.9	17.1	+115%	1,096 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.