Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BØMLO

IMO: 9299408
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EIV 63.17 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torghatten Nord AS · part of Torghatten

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

61.8

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

81.3

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−86%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,807

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+614%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,932 t

CO₂ emitted

6,193 t

6,288 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,282 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,909 h

80 days, 22% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.8 kg/nm · median 150 (−59%)

69.3Ranks 36 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.4 kn · median 15.8 (+4%)

12.0Faster than 57% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 81.3 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−86%)

66.8Ranks 52 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,807 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+614%)

48.6Ranks 379 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,193 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

121 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+95 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BØMLO
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BØMLO
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BØMLO
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BØMLO
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−1%	+5%	+16%	−30%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.2 kn	−11%	−34%	+235%	−23%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.9 kn	−10%	+18%	+50%	−40%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+18%	+18%	−69%	+55%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−48%	−53%	+191%	−76%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 48%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	1,932	6,193	31,282	1,909	16.4	61.8	–	–
2024	Torghatten Nord AS	1,684	5,400	27,009	1,748	15.5	62.4	–	–
2023	not published	565	1,813	8,051	389	20.7	70.2	–	–
2022	not published	421	1,351	5,372	340	15.8	78.4	–	–
2021	not published	1,159	3,716	17,464	1,108	15.8	66.4	–	–
2020	not published	764	2,451	6,000	346	17.3	127	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Torghatten Nord AS	81.3	567	−86%	52 of 408	1,807	253	+614%	DNV	A
2024	Torghatten Nord AS	116	547	−79%	91 of 404	2,117	233	+809%	DNV	A
2023	not published	150	680	−78%	78 of 386	3,154	234	+1,248%	DNV	A
2022	not published	250	626	−60%	114 of 394	3,471	253	+1,273%	DNV	A
2021	not published	161	815	−80%	85 of 377	1,177	226	+421%	DNV	A
2020	not published	672	751	−10%	183 of 387	5,722	217	+2,531%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.