Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PACIFIC

IMO: 9308900
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,598 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Aalborg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Alba Tankers ApS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,598 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

59.0

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+249%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,872 t

CO₂ emitted

6,002 t

6,094 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,759 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,493 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 59.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−26%)

52.8Ranks 231 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 11.1 (−18%)

8.8Faster than 13% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+249%)

7.93Ranks 1,396 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU6%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU11%

95% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,681 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

660 t

11.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+92 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PACIFIC
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PACIFIC
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PACIFIC
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+12%	+10%	−14%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−7%	−11%	−8%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+8%	+12%	−19%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+13%	−2%	+4%	−5%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−8%	+3%	+1%	+0%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+0%	+11%	−11%	+0%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−18%	−3%	+22%	−19%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Alba Tankers ApS	1,872	6,002	31,759	3,493	9.1	59.0	52.5	–
2024	Alba Tankers ApS	1,937	6,209	36,843	3,974	9.3	52.6	52.9	–
2023	not published	2,273	7,286	40,021	4,155	9.6	56.8	52.0	–
2022	not published	2,579	8,270	49,200	5,278	9.3	52.4	42.3	–
2021	not published	2,190	7,020	47,125	4,409	10.7	46.5	44.5	–
2020	not published	2,369	7,595	46,753	4,946	9.5	50.7	44.3	–
2019	not published	2,643	8,472	52,260	6,109	8.6	50.6	44.1	–
2018	not published	2,641	8,466	42,749	5,901	7.2	61.8	54.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Alba Tankers ApS	52.5	15.0	+249%	1,396 of 1,460	DNV	A
2024	Alba Tankers ApS	52.9	16.7	+216%	1,205 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	52.0	16.2	+221%	1,240 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	42.3	16.1	+163%	1,286 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	44.5	16.7	+166%	1,232 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	44.3	16.2	+174%	1,214 of 1,312	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	44.1	17.3	+155%	1,197 of 1,321	Verifavia	A+B
2018	not published	54.7	17.1	+219%	1,223 of 1,294	Verifavia	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.