Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BICE AMORETTI

IMO: 9321445
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 2,878 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Catania
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.39 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,878 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

63.7

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

70.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+367%)

Average speed

7.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,815 t

CO₂ emitted

5,756 t

5,846 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,489 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,592 h

150 days, 41% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−20%)

52.8Ranks 349 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 11.1 (−29%)

8.8Faster than 6% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 70.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+367%)

7.93Ranks 1,429 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports64%
From the EU10%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU13%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,410 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

713 t

12.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+90 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BICE AMORETTI
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BICE AMORETTI
Chemical tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BICE AMORETTI
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−7%	−10%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−6%	−5%	+10%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+20%	+10%	+10%	+69%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+9%	−2%	−20%	−3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−8%	+1%	−4%	−17%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+5.6 kn	−15%	+107%	+15%	−10%	5.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+11%	−10%	−8%	+63%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	1,815	5,756	28,489	3,592	7.9	63.7	70.2	–
2024	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	1,985	6,268	31,775	3,677	8.6	62.5	70.9	–
2023	not published	1,924	6,056	28,819	3,364	8.6	66.8	92.8	–
2022	not published	1,463	4,599	26,297	2,833	9.3	55.6	55.0	–
2021	not published	1,663	5,215	32,669	3,132	10.4	50.9	56.9	–
2020	not published	1,875	5,875	33,974	3,564	9.5	55.2	68.3	–
2019	not published	1,919	6,031	29,528	7,598	3.9	65.0	76.0	–
2018	not published	1,876	5,904	32,170	6,597	4.9	58.3	46.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	70.2	15.0	+367%	1,429 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	MARITTIMA ETNEA S.r.l.	70.9	16.7	+324%	1,249 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	92.8	16.2	+472%	1,307 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	55.0	16.1	+242%	1,360 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	56.9	16.7	+241%	1,293 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	68.3	16.2	+323%	1,288 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	76.0	17.3	+339%	1,303 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	46.6	17.1	+172%	1,178 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.