Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

METEORA

IMO: 9322944
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,517 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Bari
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.53 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Millenia Maritime Inc

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,517 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+49%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,564 t

CO₂ emitted

8,161 t

8,287 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,073 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,150 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+28%)

52.8Ranks 1,212 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 69% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+49%)

7.93Ranks 1,021 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU24%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU15%

76% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,216 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,225 t

15.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+126 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

METEORA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

METEORA
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

METEORA
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	+3%	+18%	−33%	+51%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−21%	−10%	+28%	−31%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+31%	+22%	−5%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−7%	−3%	−0%	+20%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−5%	−14%	+16%	+22%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+5%	+12%	+6%	−11%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−4%	+1%	−10%	−32%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Millenia Maritime Inc	2,564	8,161	25,073	2,150	11.7	102	22.4	–
2024	Millenia Maritime Inc	3,691	11,612	37,208	3,639	10.2	99.2	14.8	60%
2023	not published	3,637	11,382	29,109	3,232	9.0	125	21.4	–
2022	not published	2,924	9,147	30,589	3,165	9.7	95.6	24.3	–
2021	not published	3,149	9,963	30,730	3,302	9.3	103	20.3	–
2020	not published	2,861	9,052	26,571	2,580	10.3	108	16.6	–
2019	not published	2,566	8,031	25,032	2,595	9.6	103	18.6	–
2018	not published	2,968	9,275	27,787	3,032	9.2	107	27.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Millenia Maritime Inc	22.4	15.0	+49%	1,021 of 1,460	RINA	A
2024	Millenia Maritime Inc	14.8	16.7	−11%	557 of 1,274	RINA	–
2023	not published	21.4	16.2	+32%	844 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	24.3	16.1	+51%	1,038 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	20.3	16.7	+21%	855 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	16.6	16.2	+3%	680 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	18.6	17.3	+7%	734 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	27.2	17.1	+59%	983 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.