Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

KOSOVA

IMO: 9323792
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,416 t
Port of registry: Panama City
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.73 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALICE I, ALICE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marwave Shipmanagement Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,416 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

168.8 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+112%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

63.23

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+320%)

Average speed

4.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−64%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

764 t

CO₂ emitted

2,407 t

2,445 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,524 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,128 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 168.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+112%)

52.8Ranks 1,454 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 4.0 kn · median 11.1 (−64%)

8.8Faster than 1% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 63.23 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+320%)

7.93Ranks 1,422 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU27%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU11%

19% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (457 t).

Fuel burned laden

44%

56% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

11.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KOSOVA
Chemical tanker median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KOSOVA
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KOSOVA
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.0 kn	+30%	−26%	−81%	+145%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.8 kn	−20%	−43%	+29%	−28%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+40%	+27%	−38%	+101%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+3.7 kn	−19%	+24%	+403%	−52%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+9%	+50%	−79%	+17%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	493	1,545	2,744	568	4.8	179.5	60.84	69%
2025	BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.	764	2,407	4,524	1,128	4.0	168.8	63.23	44%
2024	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	3,083	9,668	23,757	3,398	7.0	129.8	25.80	59%
2023	not published	3,009	9,450	18,450	1,882	9.8	163.1	35.95	43%
2022	not published	3,481	10,912	29,842	2,755	10.8	116.6	17.92	–
2020	not published	855	2,707	5,936	840	7.1	144.0	37.07	–
2019	not published	3,835	12,024	28,924	5,647	5.1	132.6	31.73	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2025	BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.	63.23	15.04	+320%	1,422 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	25.80	16.73	+54%	919 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	35.95	16.23	+122%	1,105 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	17.92	16.06	+12%	795 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	37.07	16.16	+129%	1,145 of 1,312	ABS	A
2019	not published	31.73	17.32	+83%	1,065 of 1,321	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.